Archives
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- August 2006
- September 2006
- February 2007
- August 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- November 2015
- February 2016
- April 2016
Links
random thoughts and trivia
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
More on Star Wars Continuity
There's one point that I disagree with from the other blog. And this is one that I had already discussed with a friend before reading that blog's comments.
In my opinion the reason (that Luke was their only hope and then in an exchange between Yoda and Obi Wan the comment "there is another" seems later to have referred to Darth Vader) that Leia was totally ignored as a "hope" in both cases is obvious.
Yes it's because Leia is female. Did you SEE any female Jedi Knights? No, of course not! That semi-monk-like group was male only. (Remember in this latest movie, Anakin couldn't even marry Padame because they'd kick him out of their monk-like order.)
Leia could NOT be a Jedi Knight, therefore she wasn't ever referred to as a "hope" like Luke and Darth Vader were.
In my opinion the reason (that Luke was their only hope and then in an exchange between Yoda and Obi Wan the comment "there is another" seems later to have referred to Darth Vader) that Leia was totally ignored as a "hope" in both cases is obvious.
Yes it's because Leia is female. Did you SEE any female Jedi Knights? No, of course not! That semi-monk-like group was male only. (Remember in this latest movie, Anakin couldn't even marry Padame because they'd kick him out of their monk-like order.)
Leia could NOT be a Jedi Knight, therefore she wasn't ever referred to as a "hope" like Luke and Darth Vader were.
|